Stimuli-Response in Organic Cocrystals with Different Donor-Acceptors

Authors

  • Darya khan Hassand School of Education, Department of Chemistry, Ghazni University, Ghazni 2301, Afghanistan Author https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5536-3104
  • Nawrooz Ali Zahedi School of Education, Department of Chemistry, Ghazni University, Ghazni 2301, Afghanistan Author
  • Abdul Samad Hamid School of Education, Department of Chemistry, Ghazni University, Ghazni 2301, Afghanistan Author
  • Mohammad Sharif Stanikzai School of Chemical Industrial Engineering, Department of Petrochemical and Gas Industrial Engineering, Kabul Polytechnic University, Kabul 100, Afghanistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64060/JESTT3i21

Keywords:

Acid stimuli, Cocrystal growth, CT interactions, Organic cocrystals, Solvent evaporation

Abstract

Organic cocrystal engineering refers to the stoichiometric combination of two or more organic molecules through non-covalent intermolecular interactions, but achieving excellent electrical and optical properties remains a challenge due to the lack of clear directions for the rational design of co-crystals. In addition, herein we compare and report these three new cocrystals' chemical and physical properties, crystalline structures and determined response to acid stimuli. This investigation of organic cocrystals contains intermolecular interactions and growth methods, especially the solvent evaporation approach. As a result, we synthesised three new organic cocrystals; among these cocrystals, 3-ATC has the highest response to acid stimuli (different acid fuming). The cocrystal’s response time is also in the order of seconds, which is much faster than that of most other stimuli-responsive cocrystals previously described. 3-ATC is a highly sensitive fluorescence switching exhibited under various acid stimuli. But, the other two cocrystals (AETC and DTTC) are strong enough to resist acid stimuli; this is due to the close face-to-face and mixed stacking patterns with CT and π-π interactions. These three cocrystals exhibited different colours and low-dimensional (1D, 2D) morphology structures. 

References

1. S. Sato, H. Nikawa, S. Seki, L. Wang, G. Luo, J. Lu, M. Haranaka, T. Tsuchiya, S. Nagase, T. Akasaka, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. (2012), 51, 1589–1591.

2. T. Wakahara, P. D’Angelo, K. Miyazawa, Y. Nemoto, O. Ito, N. Tanigaki, D.D.C. Bradley, T.D. Anthop ou los, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2012), 134, 7204–7206.

3. N. Schultheiss, A. Newman, , Cryst. Growth &Design. (2009), 9, 2950–2967.

4. J. Zhang, H. Geng, T.S. Virk, Y. Zhao, J. Tan, C.A. Di, W. Xu, K. Singh, W. Hu, Z. Shuai, Y. Liu, D. Zhu, Adv. Mater. (2012), 24, 2603–2607.

5. H. Dong, H. Zhu, Q. Meng, X. Gong, W. Hu, Chem. Soc. Rev. (2012), 41, 1754–1808.

6. S.K. Park, J.H. Kim, T. Ohto, R. Yamada, A.O.F. Jones, D.R. Whang, I. Cho, S. Oh, S.H. Hong, J.E. Kwon, J.H. Kim, Y. Olivier, R. Fischer, R. Resel, J. Gierschner, H. Tada, S.Y. Park, Adv. Mater. (2017), 29, 201701346.

7. B. Zhou, Q. Zhao, L. Tang, D. Yan, Chem. Commun. (2020), 56, 7698–7701.

8. L. Sun, W. Zhu, W. Wang, F. Yang, C. Zhang, S. Wang, X. Zhang, R. Li, H. Dong, W. Hu, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. (2017), 56, 7831–7835.

9. M. Jiang, S. Li, C. Zhen, L. Wang, F. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Dong, X. Zhang, W. Hu, Front. Optoelectron. (2022), 15, 1–10.

10. J. Jin, S. Wu, Y. Ma, C. Dong, W. Wang, X. Liu, H. Xu, G. Long, M. Zhang, J. Zhang, W. Huang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. (2020), 12, 19718–19726.

11. Y.L. Lei, Y. Jin, D.Y. Zhou, W. Gu, X.B. Shi, L.S. Liao, S.T. Lee, Adv. Mater. (2012), 24, 5345–5351.

12. D. Khan, M.A.B.A , Zhang Xiaotao, Muhammad Hasnain Jameel, uhammad S.B.R. and M.A. MBajaber, Micro Nano Syst. Lett. (2023), 11:24, 2- 9.

13. S. Li, D. Yan, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. (2018), 10, 22703–22710.

14. H. Jiang, C. Kloc, MRS Bull. (2013), 38, 28–33.

15. D. Braga, L. Maini, F. Grepioni, Chem. Soc. Rev. (2013), 42, 7638–7648.

16. M. Jiang, C. Zhen, S. Li, X. Zhang, W. Hu, Front. Chem. (2021), 9, 1–16.

17. H. wenping zhu weigang, zhen yonggang, Dong huanli, Fu hongbing, Prog. Chem. (2014), 26, 1292–1306.

18. Y.L. Lei, L.S. Liao, S.T. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2013), 135, 3744–3747.

19. Y. Liu, Q. Zeng, B. Zou, Y. Liu, B. Xu, W. Tian, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. (2018), 57, 15670–15674.

20. L. Sun, W. Zhu, F. Yang, B. Li, X. Ren, X. Zhang, W. Hu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. (2018), 20, 6009–6023.

21. L. Sun, Y. Wang, F. Yang, X. Zhang, W. Hu, Adv. Mater. (2019), 31, 1–22.

22. Y. Liu, A. Li, S. Xu, W. Xu, Y. Liu, W. Tian, B. Xu, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. (2020), 59, 15098–15103.

23. W. Hu, H. Zhang, K. Salaita, H. Sirringhaus, SmartMat. (2020), 1, 1014.

24. D. Jérome, A. Mazaud, M. Ribault, K. Bechgaard, D. Jérome, A. Mazaud, M. Ribault, K. Bechgaard, HAL. (2008), 23, 1730.

25. Y. Zhai, S. Li, J. Li, S. Liu, T.D. James, J.L. Sessler, Z. Chen, Nat. Commun. (2023), 14, 1–10.

122

Published

2026-05-11

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories

How to Cite

Stimuli-Response in Organic Cocrystals with Different Donor-Acceptors. (2026). Journal of Engineering, Science and Technological Trends, 3(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.64060/JESTT3i21

Share