Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Glaucoma from Fundus and OCT Imaging: A Structured Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64060/JESTT3i31Keywords:
Glaucoma, computer-aided diagnosis, deep learning, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, clinical decision supportAbstract
Glaucoma remains a leading cause of irreversible visual disability worldwide, largely because structural damage to the optic nerve can progress substantially before a patient notices any vision change. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) using deep learning has therefore been explored as a strategy to support earlier identification, drawing on fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), visual field testing, and combinations of these modalities. This structured review discusses recent studies on AI-assisted detection in glaucoma management and considers their practical significance for clinical care. According to the literature reviewed, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) play a clear role in glaucoma screening, explicit segmentation models support assessment of the optic disc and cup, and OCT-based methods represent structural change more directly than surface imaging alone. Multimodal approaches, three-dimensional OCT analysis, transformer architectures, and progression-tracking models represent active and promising directions. However, clinical translation remains constrained by biased or geographically narrow datasets, device-specific variation, limited external validation, and unresolved questions about the reliability of individual predictions. The literature therefore supports AI as a developing decision-support tool that complements, rather than replaces, ophthalmic assessment. Further research should prioritise validation of AI-based tools in multi-centre settings, transparent documentation of errors and uncertainty, and prospective testing of systems intended for real-time clinical use.
References
1. Y.-C. Tham, X. Li, T. Y. Wong, H. A. Quigley, T. Aung, and C.-Y. Cheng, “Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 2081-2090, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.
2. L. Zhang, L. Tang, M. Xia, and G. Cao, “The application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma diagnosis and prediction,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 11, 1173094, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1173094.
3. S. Gheisari et al., “A combined convolutional and recurrent neural network for enhanced glaucoma detection,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, 1945, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81554-4.
4. L. Pascal, O. J. Perdomo, X. Bost, B. Huet, S. Otálora, and M. A. Zuluaga, “Multi-task deep learning for glaucoma detection from color fundus images,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, 12361, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16262-8.
5. R. Hemelings, B. Elen, J. Barbosa-Breda, M. B. Blaschko, P. De Boever, and I. Stalmans, “Deep learning on fundus images detects glaucoma beyond the optic disc,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, 20313, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99605-1.
6. W. S. Lim et al., “Use of multimodal dataset in AI for detecting glaucoma based on fundus photographs assessed with OCT: Focus group study on high prevalence of myopia,” BMC Medical Imaging, vol. 22, 206, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00933-z.
7. X. Huang et al., “Detecting glaucoma from multi-modal data using probabilistic deep learning,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 9, 923096, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923096.
8. F. A. Braeu et al., “Geometric deep learning to identify the critical 3D structural features of the optic nerve head for glaucoma diagnosis,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 250, pp. 38-48, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.01.008.
9. E. B. Mariottoni et al., “Deep learning-assisted detection of glaucoma progression in spectral-domain OCT,” Ophthalmology Glaucoma, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 228-238, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.11.004.
10. R. Fan et al., “Detecting glaucoma from fundus photographs using deep learning without convolutions: Transformer for improved generalization,” Ophthalmology Science, vol. 3, no. 1, 100233, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100233.
11. R. Kashyap, R. Nair, S. M. P. Gangadharan, M. Botto-Tobar, S. Farooq, and A. Rizwan, “Glaucoma detection and classification using improved U-Net deep learning model,” Healthcare, vol. 10, no. 12, 2497, 2022, doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122497.
12. M. Nawaz et al., “An efficient deep learning approach to automatic glaucoma detection using optic disc and optic cup localization,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 2, 434, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22020434.
13. S. Thanapaisal et al., “Machine learning technology in the classification of glaucoma severity using fundus photographs,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, 26151, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11697-1.
14. D. Milad et al., “Code-free deep learning glaucoma detection on color fundus images,” Ophthalmology Science, vol. 5, no. 4, 100721, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100721.
15. V. Yadav, B. Dey, U. Baruah, S. Das, and O. Prakash, “Machine learning-assisted image analysis techniques for glaucoma detection,” EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, vol. 2025, 7, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s13640-025-00668-1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qurat Ul Aen Naqvi, Aneeza Saeed , Ahmad Muneeb, Ume Aiman , Kashmala Sahar (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





